| Title |
Recent Developments in Computing and Philosophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for General Philosophy of Science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10838-011-9164-y |
| Authors |
Anthony F. Beavers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 9 | 30% |
| Philosophy | 7 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,268,111
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#14
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,070
of 124,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them