| Title |
A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine-based Collaborative Care for Depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0201-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John C. Fortney, Jeffrey M. Pyne, Mark J. Edlund, David K. Williams, Dean E. Robinson, Dinesh Mittal, Kathy L. Henderson |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based practices designed for large urban clinics are not necessarily portable into smaller isolated clinics. Implementing practice-based collaborative care for depression in smaller primary care clinics presents unique challenges because it is often not feasible to employ on-site psychiatrists. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 280 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 21% |
| Unknown | 65 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 24% |
| Psychology | 58 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,149,425
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,281
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,497
of 73,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.