↓ Skip to main content

Holocyclotoxin-1, a cystine knot toxin from Ixodes holocyclus

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicon, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 3,363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Holocyclotoxin-1, a cystine knot toxin from Ixodes holocyclus
Published in
Toxicon, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.08.068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Vink, Norelle L. Daly, Natalie Steen, David J. Craik, Paul F. Alewood

Abstract

In the past 100 years minimal venom research has focused on ticks despite several species possessing a highly paralytic and lethal venom cocktail of proteinaceous molecules. The saliva of the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus, has been responsible for 20 human fatalities from 1900 to 1945, and up to 100,000 domestic animal fatalities annually. In the last 50 years, research on this tick has focused on identifying the neurotoxins present in the saliva and in the last ten years the sequence of a potential neurotoxin, HT-1, has been determined. In this study we chemically synthesised HT-1 using Boc-chemistry in combination with native chemical ligation. Following successful oxidative folding, we determined the three-dimensional structure of HT-1 by NMR spectroscopy and found a novel structural fold with three of the four disulfide bonds comprising the inhibitory cystine knot (ICK) motif. The fourth disulfide bond connects the second loop to the N-terminal, which decreases the flexibility of the structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 36%
Chemistry 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#656,019
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Toxicon
#24
of 3,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,268
of 247,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicon
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.