↓ Skip to main content

What childhood characteristics predict psychological resilience to economic shocks in adulthood?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economic Psychology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What childhood characteristics predict psychological resilience to economic shocks in adulthood?
Published in
Journal of Economic Psychology, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2014.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nattavudh Powdthavee

Abstract

This paper investigates whether people's psychological resilience to one of the most important economic shocks - job loss - can be predicted using early childhood characteristics. Using a longitudinal data that tracked almost 3000 children into adulthood, we showed that the negative effect of unemployment on mental well-being and life satisfaction is significantly larger for workers who, as adolescents, had a relatively poor father-child relationship. Maternal unemployment, on the other hand, is a good predictor of how individuals react psychologically to future unemployment. Although the results should be viewed as illustrative and more research is needed, the current article provides new longitudinal evidence that psychological resilience to job loss may be determined early on in the life cycle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 15%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,285,971
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Psychology
#179
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,644
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Psychology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.