↓ Skip to main content

Cancer in First Nations people living in British Columbia, Canada: an analysis of incidence and survival from 1993 to 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Cancer in First Nations people living in British Columbia, Canada: an analysis of incidence and survival from 1993 to 2010
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10552-017-0950-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen E. McGahan, Kevin Linn, Preston Guno, Harmony Johnson, Andrew J. Coldman, John J. Spinelli, Nadine R. Caron

Abstract

For First Nations (FN) peoples living in British Columbia (BC), little is known regarding cancer in the population. The aim of this study was to explore cancer incidence and survival in the FN population of BC and compare it to the non-FN population. All new cancers diagnosed from 1993 to 2010 were linked to the First Nations Client File (FNCF). Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and rate ratios, and 1- and 5-year cause-specific survival estimates and hazard ratios were calculated. Follow-up end date for survival was December 31, 2011 and follow-up time was censored at a maximum of 15 years. ASIR of colorectal cancer (male SRR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.25-1.61; female SRR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38) and cervical cancer (SRR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.45-2.33) were higher overall in FN residents in BC, compared to non-FN residents. Incidence rates of almost all other cancers were generally similar or lower in FN populations overall and by sex, age, and period categories, compared to non-FN residents. Trends in ASIR over time were similar except for lung (increasing for FN, decreasing for non-FN) and colorectal cancers (increasing for FN, decreasing for non-FN). Conversely, survival rates were generally lower for FN, with differences evident for some cancer sites at 1 year following diagnosis. FN people living in BC face unique cancer issues compared to non-FN people. Higher incidence and lower survival associated with certain cancer types require further research to look into the likely multifaceted basis for these findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 28%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 18%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,248,679
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#123
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,160
of 318,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.