↓ Skip to main content

Layered Double Hydroxide Minerals as Possible Prebiotic Information Storage and Transfer Compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Layered Double Hydroxide Minerals as Possible Prebiotic Information Storage and Transfer Compounds
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11084-005-2068-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Chris Greenwell, Peter V. Coveney

Abstract

One of the fundamental difficulties when considering the origin of life on Earth is the identification of an emergent system that not only replicated, but also had the capacity to undergo discrete mutation in such a way that following generations might inherit and pass on the mutation. We speculate that the layered double hydroxide (LDH) minerals are plausible candidates for a proto-RNA molecule. We describe a hypothetical LDH-like system which, when intercalated with certain anions, forms crystals with a high degree of internal order giving rise to novel information storage structures in which replication fidelity is maintained, a concept we use to propose an explanation for interstratification in terephthalate LDHs. The external surfaces of these hypothetical crystals provide active sites whose structure and chemistry is dictated by the internal information content of the LDH. Depending on the LDH polytype, the opposing external surfaces of a crystal may give rise to reactive sites that are either complementary or mirror images of each other, and so may be chiral. We also examine similarities between these proposed "proto-RNA" structures and the DNA that encodes the hereditary information in life today, concluding with a hypothetical scenario wherein these proto-RNA molecules predated the putative RNA-world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Master 10 17%
Professor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 27%
Chemistry 16 27%
Engineering 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,052,229
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#296
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,067
of 159,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.