↓ Skip to main content

Basic oral care for hematology–oncology patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a position paper from the joint task force of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care…

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Basic oral care for hematology–oncology patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a position paper from the joint task force of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00520-014-2378-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Elad, Judith E. Raber-Durlacher, Michael T. Brennan, Deborah P. Saunders, Arno P. Mank, Yehuda Zadik, Barry Quinn, Joel B. Epstein, Nicole M. A. Blijlevens, Tuomas Waltimo, Jakob R. Passweg, M. Elvira P. Correa, Göran Dahllöf, Karin U. E. Garming-Legert, Richard M. Logan, Carin M. J. Potting, Michael Y. Shapira, Yoshihiko Soga, Jacqui Stringer, Monique A. Stokman, Samuel Vokurka, Elisabeth Wallhult, Noam Yarom, Siri Beier Jensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 15 8%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,124
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,111
of 253,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#33
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.