You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk of Atypical Femoral Fracture during and after Bisphosphonate Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmc1403799 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jörg Schilcher, Veronika Koeppen, Per Aspenberg, Karl Michaëlsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Sweden | 2 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 3% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 69 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 74 | 76% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#763,155
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,285
of 32,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,466
of 249,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#108
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.