You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
生態学におけるAICの誤用 : AICは正しいモデルを選ぶためのものではないので正しいモデルを選ばない(生態学におけるモデル選択)
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.18960/seitai.65.2_179 |
Authors |
粕谷 英一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 42% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,259,417
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#27
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,462
of 277,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.