↓ Skip to main content

Dipeptide repeat proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dipeptide repeat proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Published in
Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/nan.12178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atik Baborie, Timothy D. Griffiths, Evelyn Jaros, Robert Perry, Ian G. McKeith, David J. Burn, Masami Masuda‐Suzukake, Masato Hasegawa, Sara Rollinson, Stuart Pickering‐Brown, Andrew C. Robinson, Yvonne S. Davidson, David M. A. Mann

Abstract

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Motor Neuron Disease are linked by the possession of a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72, and both show neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions within cerebellar and hippocampal neurones which are TDP-43 negative but immunoreactive for p62 and dipeptide repeat proteins (DPR), these being generated by a non-ATG RAN translation of the expanded region of the gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 34 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,119,699
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology
#201
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,429
of 278,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology
#8
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.