| Title |
The biodiversity impacts of non-native species should not be extrapolated from biased single-species studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1439-0 |
| Authors |
Greg R. Guerin, Irene Martín-Forés, Ben Sparrow, Andrew J. Lowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,650,390
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,652
of 2,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,880
of 321,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.