↓ Skip to main content

L-Serine: a Naturally-Occurring Amino Acid with Therapeutic Potential

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotoxicity Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
L-Serine: a Naturally-Occurring Amino Acid with Therapeutic Potential
Published in
Neurotoxicity Research, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12640-017-9814-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. S. Metcalf, R. A. Dunlop, J. T. Powell, S. A. Banack, P. A. Cox

Abstract

In human neuroblastoma cell cultures, non-human primates and human beings, L-serine is neuroprotective, acting through a variety of biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Although L-serine is generally classified as a non-essential amino acid, it is probably more appropriate to term it as a "conditional non-essential amino acid" since, under certain circumstances, vertebrates cannot synthesize it in sufficient quantities to meet necessary cellular demands. L-serine is biosynthesized in the mammalian central nervous system from 3-phosphoglycerate and serves as a precursor for the synthesis of the amino acids glycine and cysteine. Physiologically, it has a variety of roles, perhaps most importantly as a phosphorylation site in proteins. Mutations in the metabolic enzymes that synthesize L-serine have been implicated in various human diseases. Dosing of animals with L-serine and human clinical trials investigating the therapeutic effects of L-serine support the FDA's determination that L-serine is generally regarded as safe (GRAS); it also appears to be neuroprotective. We here consider the role of L-serine in neurological disorders and its potential as a therapeutic agent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 21%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Chemistry 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,205,915
of 25,304,569 outputs
Outputs from Neurotoxicity Research
#51
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,711
of 324,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotoxicity Research
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,304,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.