↓ Skip to main content

The detritus-based microbial-invertebrate food web contributes disproportionately to carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Arctic

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
The detritus-based microbial-invertebrate food web contributes disproportionately to carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Arctic
Published in
Polar Biology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2201-5
Authors

Amanda M. Koltz, Ashley Asmus, Laura Gough, Yamina Pressler, John C. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 32%
Environmental Science 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,130,292
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#125
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,533
of 324,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.