↓ Skip to main content

Reprogramming Fibroblasts to Endothelial Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reprogramming Fibroblasts to Endothelial Cells
Published in
Circulation, September 2014
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.114.012540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianghui Zhang, Asrar B Malik, Jalees Rehman

Abstract

"These results show that a nucleus can promote the formation of a differentiated intestine cell and at the same time contain the genetic information necessary for the formation of all other types of differentiated somatic cell in a normal feeding tadpole. It is concluded that the differentiation of a cell cannot be dependent upon the incapacity of its nucleus to give rise to other types f differentiated cell." This is the concluding paragraph of Sir John Gurdon's seminal study published in 1962, in which he demonstrated that nuclei from differentiated intestinal epithelial cells could give rise to normal tadpoles following transfer into an enucleated recipient egg(1). Half a century later, Gurdon would receive the Nobel Prize together with Shinya Yamanaka, whose equally seminal work had shown that adult mouse fibroblasts could be reprogrammed to a fully pluripotent stem cell state(2), for their contributions to reprogramming differentiated cells. Unlike Gurdon's nuclear transfer approach, Yamanaka's method relied on the expression of the transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4 (also known as the "Yamanaka factors") in fibroblasts, which activated the cells' dormant embryonic pluripotency gene network and generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The iPSCs, in turn, could then be differentiated into a variety of desired cell types such as neurons, hepatocytes or cardiomyocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#19,666
of 21,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,187
of 249,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#135
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.