↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the sensitivity of seven marine and freshwater bioassays as regards antidepressant toxicity assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of the sensitivity of seven marine and freshwater bioassays as regards antidepressant toxicity assessment
Published in
Ecotoxicology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1339-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laetitia Minguez, Carole Di Poi, Emilie Farcy, Céline Ballandonne, Amira Benchouala, Clément Bojic, Carole Cossu-Leguille, Katherine Costil, Antoine Serpentini, Jean-Marc Lebel, Marie-Pierre Halm-Lemeille

Abstract

The hazards linked to pharmaceutical residues like antidepressants are currently a major concern of ecotoxicology because they may have adverse effects on non-target aquatic organisms. Our study assesses the ecotoxicity of three antidepressants (fluoxetine, sertraline and clomipramine) using a battery of marine and freshwater species representing different trophic levels, and compares the bioassay sensitivity levels. We selected the following bioassays: the algal growth inhibition test (Skeletonema marinoi and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), the microcrustacean immobilization test (Artemia salina and Daphnia magna), development and adult survival tests on Hydra attenuata, embryotoxicity and metamorphosis tests on Crassostrea gigas, and in vitro assays on primary cultures of Haliotis tuberculata hemocytes. The results showed high inter-species variability in EC50-values ranging from 43 to 15,600 µg/L for fluoxetine, from 67 to 4,400 µg/L for sertraline, and from 4.70 µg/L to more than 100,000 µg/L for clomipramine. Algae (S. marinoi and P. subcapitata) and the embryo-larval stages of the oyster C. gigas were the most sensitive taxa. This raises an issue due to their ecological and/or economic importance. The marine crustacean A. salina was the least sensitive species. This difference in sensitivity between bioassays highlights the importance of using a test battery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Environmental Science 20 22%
Chemistry 7 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#968
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,293
of 237,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.