| Title |
Nasal high–flow oxygen therapy in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure: effect on functional and subjective respiratory parameters compared to conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norbert Schwabbauer, Björn Berg, Gunnar Blumenstock, Michael Haap, Jürgen Hetzel, Reimer Riessen |
| Abstract |
Aim of the study was to compare the short-term effects of oxygen therapy via a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on functional and subjective respiratory parameters in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure in comparison to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and standard treatment via a Venturi mask. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,529,297
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#172
of 1,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,727
of 230,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.