↓ Skip to main content

Imaging of Site Specific Bone Turnover in Osteoporosis Using Positron Emission Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Imaging of Site Specific Bone Turnover in Osteoporosis Using Positron Emission Tomography
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11914-014-0231-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glen M. Blake, Musib Siddique, Michelle L. Frost, Amelia E. B. Moore, Ignac Fogelman

Abstract

The functional imaging technique of dynamic fluorine-18 labeled sodium fluoride positron emission tomography ((18)F-NaF PET) allows the quantitative assessment of regional bone formation by measuring the plasma clearance of fluoride to bone at any site in the skeleton. (18)F-NaF PET provides a novel and noninvasive method of studying site-specific bone formation at the hip and spine, as well as areas of pure cortical or trabecular bone. The technique complements conventional measurements of bone turnover using biochemical markers and bone biopsy as a tool to investigate new treatments for osteoporosis, and holds promise of a future role as an early biomarker of treatment efficacy in clinical trials. This article reviews methods of acquiring and analyzing (18)F-NaF PET scan data, and outlines a simplified approach that uses 5-minute static PET scan images combined with venous blood samples to estimate (18)F-NaF plasma clearance at multiple sites in the skeleton with a single injection of tracer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Physics and Astronomy 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,919,373
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#252
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,769
of 236,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.