↓ Skip to main content

A proposal for a portal to make earth’s microbial diversity easily accessible and searchable

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
A proposal for a portal to make earth’s microbial diversity easily accessible and searchable
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10482-017-0849-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boris A. Vinatzer, Long Tian, Lenwood S. Heath

Abstract

Estimates of the number of bacterial species range from 10(7) to 10(12). At the pace at which descriptions of new species are currently being published, the description of all bacterial species on earth will only be completed in thousands of years. However, even if one day all species were named and described, these names and descriptions would still be of little practical value unless they could be easily searched and accessed, so that novel strains could be easily identified as members of any of these species. To complicate the situation further, many of the currently known species contain significant genotypic and phenotypic diversity that would still be missed if description of microbial diversity were limited to species. The solution to this problem could be a database in which every bacterial species and every intra-specific group is anchored to a genome-similarity framework. This ideal database should be searchable using complete or partial genome sequences as well as phenotypes. Moreover, the database should include functions to easily add newly sequenced novel strains, automatically place them into the genome-similarity framework, identify them as members of an already named species, or tag them as members of yet to be described species or new intra-specific groups. Here, we propose the means to develop such a database by taking advantage of the concept of genome sequence similarity-based codes, called Life Identification Numbers or LINs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#19,534,521
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,604
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,913
of 313,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.