| Title |
Adding ecological value to the urban lawnscape. Insect abundance and diversity in grass-free lawns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0788-1 |
| Authors |
Lionel S. Smith, Moth E. J. Broyles, Helen K. Larzleer, Mark D. E. Fellowes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 26% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,062,020
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#293
of 2,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,359
of 242,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.