You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61490-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aris T Papageorghiou, Eric O Ohuma, Douglas G Altman, Tullia Todros, Leila Cheikh Ismail, Ann Lambert, Yasmin A Jaffer, Enrico Bertino, Michael G Gravett, Manorama Purwar, J Alison Noble, Ruyan Pang, Cesar G Victora, Fernando C Barros, Maria Carvalho, Laurent J Salomon, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Stephen H Kennedy, José Villar, for the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 655 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 640 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 13% |
| Researcher | 79 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 11% |
| Other | 60 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 166 | 25% |
| Unknown | 145 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 317 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 10% |
| Unknown | 177 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#467,075
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,429
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,245
of 249,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#73
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.