↓ Skip to main content

Extensively damaged trees tested with acoustic tomography considering tree stability in urban greenery

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Extensively damaged trees tested with acoustic tomography considering tree stability in urban greenery
Published in
Trees, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1526-6
Authors

Radovan Ostrovský, Marek Kobza, Ján Gažo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 38%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Engineering 4 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,060,819
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#280
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,596
of 424,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.