↓ Skip to main content

Bonus versus penalty: How robust are the effects of contract framing?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Economic Science Association, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Bonus versus penalty: How robust are the effects of contract framing?
Published in
Journal of the Economic Science Association, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40881-017-0039-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan de Quidt, Francesco Fallucchi, Felix Kölle, Daniele Nosenzo, Simone Quercia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,814,503
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Economic Science Association
#48
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,356
of 328,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Economic Science Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them