Title |
The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x693077 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lindsay JL Forbes, Catherine Marchand, Tim Doran, Stephen Peckham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 15 | 37% |
Ireland | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 44% |
Scientists | 14 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 261 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
Researcher | 26 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 6% |
Other | 51 | 20% |
Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
Psychology | 11 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
Other | 35 | 13% |
Unknown | 89 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,306,723
of 25,197,939 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#615
of 4,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,965
of 326,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,197,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.