↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous transcatheter biopsy for intracardiac mass diagnosis.

Overview of attention for article published in EuroIntervention, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous transcatheter biopsy for intracardiac mass diagnosis.
Published in
EuroIntervention, December 2017
DOI 10.4244/eij-d-17-00707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gautam Reddy, Elad Maor, Melanie C Bois, Krishnaswamy Chandrasekharan, Charanjit S Rihal, Rick A Nishimura, David R Holmes, Guy S Reeder, Joseph J Maleszewski, Kyle W Klarich

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of intracardiac masses (ICM) is wide. While imaging modalities cansuggest a diagnosis, clinical decision making usually requires histopathologic diagnosis. The aimwas to describe procedural technique, safety outcomes, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utilityof percutaneous transcatheter biopsy (TCB) for histopathologic diagnosis of ICM. The records ofall patients undergoing TCB of ICM at the Mayo Clinic catheterization laboratories in RochesterMinnesota between 2002 and 2017 were retrieved and reviewed. TCB of ICM to establish histopathologic diagnosis was performed in 29 patients. Masses werelocated in the right-sided chambers in 93% of cases. Echocardiographic guidance was used.Ventricular arrhythmias requiring immediate cardioversion occurred in 7% of patients. No othercomplications were noted. The average number of samples retrieved per procedure was 7 ±3.6. A histopathologic diagnosis was made by TCB in 72% and altered clinical decision making in52% of patients overall. 11 patients (38%) who would have otherwise required excisional biopsywere able to avoid cardiovascular surgery. Each additional biopsy sample was associated withan increase in the likelihood of making a histopathologic diagnosis (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.05-2.87,p = 0.032).1.3 Conclusions: Echo-guided percutaneous TCB of ICM provides an accurate diagnosis and alters clinicalmanagement in the majority of cases. The procedural complication rate is low. An increase inthe number of samples retrieved markedly improves the ability to render a diagnosis. TCB maytherefore be considered as a first line approach for the histopathologic diagnosis of ICM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Engineering 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,189,798
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from EuroIntervention
#979
of 2,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,450
of 445,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EuroIntervention
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.