↓ Skip to main content

Extreme Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Enables Overwintering Black Bear Survival—Physiological Insights and Applications to Human Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Extreme Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Enables Overwintering Black Bear Survival—Physiological Insights and Applications to Human Medicine
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12265-010-9185-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy G. Laske, Henry J. Harlow, David L. Garshelis, Paul A. Iaizzo

Abstract

American black bears survive winter months without food and water while in a mildly hypothermic, hypometabolic, and inactive state, yet they appear to be able to return to near-normal systemic function within minutes of arousal. This study's goal was to characterize the cardiovascular performance of overwintering black bears and elicit the underlying mechanisms enabling survival. Mid-winter cardiac electrophysiology was assessed in four wild black bears using implanted data recorders. Paired data from early and late winter were collected from 37 wild bears, which were anesthetized and temporarily removed from their dens to record cardiac electrophysiological parameters (12-lead electrocardiograms) and cardiac dimensional changes (echocardiography). Left ventricular thickness, primary cardiac electrophysiological parameters, and cardiovascular response to threats ("fight or flight" response) were preserved throughout winter. Dramatic respiratory sinus arrhythmias were recorded (cardiac cycle length variations up to 865%) with long sinus pauses between breaths (up to 13 s). The accelerated heart rate during breathing efficiently transports oxygen, with the heart "resting" between breaths to minimize energy usage. This adaptive cardiac physiology may have broad implications for human medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Environmental Science 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,305,567
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#356
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,718
of 95,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.