↓ Skip to main content

Patellofemoral pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1126 Mendeley
Title
Patellofemoral pain syndrome
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2759-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolf Petersen, Andree Ellermann, Andreas Gösele‐Koppenburg, Raymond Best, Ingo Volker Rembitzki, Gerd‐Peter Brüggemann, Christian Liebau

Abstract

The patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a possible cause for anterior knee pain, which predominantly affects young female patients without any structural changes such as increased Q-angle or significant chondral damage. This literature review has shown that PFPS development is probably multifactorial with various functional disorders of the lower extremity. Biomechanical studies described patellar maltracking and dynamic valgus in PFPS patients (functional malalignment). Causes for the dynamic valgus may be decreased strength of the hip abductors or abnormal rear-foot eversion with pes pronatus valgus. PFPS is further associated with vastus medialis/vastus lateralis dysbalance, hamstring tightness or iliotibial tract tightness. The literature provides evidence for a multimodal non-operative therapy concept with short-term use of NSAIDs, short-term use of a medially directed tape and exercise programmes with the inclusion of the lower extremity, and hip and trunk muscles. There is also evidence for the use of patellar braces and foot orthosis. A randomized controlled trial has shown that arthroscopy is not the treatment of choice for treatment of PFPS without any structural changes. Patients with anterior knee pain have to be examined carefully with regard to functional causes for a PFPS. The treatment of PFPS patients is non-operative and should address the functional causes. Level of evidence V.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 255 23%
Student > Master 162 14%
Student > Postgraduate 68 6%
Researcher 63 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 5%
Other 162 14%
Unknown 355 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 297 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 197 17%
Sports and Recreations 136 12%
Engineering 21 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 2%
Other 62 6%
Unknown 393 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,914,750
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#337
of 2,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,089
of 212,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.