| Title |
The Rheology of Liquids: A Comparison of Clinicians’ Subjective Impressions and Objective Measurement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-002-0104-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catriona M. Steele, Pascal H. H. M. Van Lieshout, Douglas H. Goff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,269
of 50,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.