↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between health care expenditure and health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between health care expenditure and health outcomes
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10198-005-0336-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Nixon, Philippe Ulmann

Abstract

The relationship between health care expenditure and health outcomes is of interest to policy makers in the light of steady increases in health care spending for most industrialised countries. However, establishing causal relationships is complex because, firstly, health care expenditure is only one of many quantitative and qualitative factors that contribute to health outcomes, and, secondly, measurement of health status is an imperfect process. This study reviews key findings and methodological approaches in this field and reports the results of our own empirical study of countries of the European Union. Our analysis examines life expectancy and infant mortality as the 'output' of the health care system, and various life-style, environmental and occupational factors as 'inputs'. Econometric analyses using a fixed effects model are conducted on a panel data set for the former 15 members of the European Union over the period 1980-1995. The findings show that increases in health care expenditure are significantly associated with large improvements in infant mortality but only marginally in relation to life expectancy. The findings are generally consistent with those of several previous studies. Caveats and improvements for future research are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 84 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 14%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 64 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,260,360
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#93
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,581
of 95,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them