↓ Skip to main content

Aβ seeds resist inactivation by formaldehyde

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aβ seeds resist inactivation by formaldehyde
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1339-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah K. Fritschi, Amarallys Cintron, Lan Ye, Jasmin Mahler, Anika Bühler, Frank Baumann, Manuela Neumann, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Per Hammarström, Lary C. Walker, Mathias Jucker

Abstract

Cerebral β-amyloidosis can be exogenously induced by the intracerebral injection of brain extracts containing aggregated β-amyloid (Aβ) into young, pre-depositing Aβ precursor protein- (APP) transgenic mice. Previous work has shown that the induction involves a prion-like seeding mechanism in which the seeding agent is aggregated Aβ itself. Here we report that the β-amyloid-inducing activity of Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain tissue or aged APP-transgenic mouse brain tissue is preserved, albeit with reduced efficacy, after formaldehyde fixation. Moreover, spectral analysis with amyloid conformation-sensitive luminescent conjugated oligothiophene dyes reveals that the strain-like properties of aggregated Aβ are maintained in fixed tissues. The resistance of Aβ seeds to inactivation and structural modification by formaldehyde underscores their remarkable durability, which in turn may contribute to their persistence and spread within the body. The present findings can be exploited to establish the relationship between the molecular structure of Aβ aggregates and the variable clinical features and disease progression of AD even in archived, formalin-fixed autopsy material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Neuroscience 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,486,340
of 23,847,962 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,306
of 2,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,797
of 241,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,847,962 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.