↓ Skip to main content

Aptamer-based fluorometric determination of norovirus using a paper-based microfluidic device

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Aptamer-based fluorometric determination of norovirus using a paper-based microfluidic device
Published in
Microchimica Acta, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00604-017-2467-x
Authors

Xuan Weng, Suresh Neethirajan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Engineering 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,480,316
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#669
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,412
of 316,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.