You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of right ventricular pacing lead site on left ventricular function in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: results of the Protect-Pace study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Heart Journal, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald C. Kaye, Nicholas J. Linker, Thomas H. Marwick, Lucy Pollock, Laura Graham, Erika Pouliot, Jan Poloniecki, Michael Gammage, Gerald Kaye, Paul Martin, Chris Pepper, Kare Tang, Ian Crozier, Graham Goode, Glenn Young, Sanjiv Petkar, Ed Langford, Nicholas John Linker, Adrian Rozkovec, Aldo Rinaldi, Zaheer Yousef, Nigel Lever, Russell Denman, Glen Young, Ian Williams, Andrew McGavigan |
| Abstract |
Chronic right ventricle (RV) apical (RVA) pacing is standard treatment for an atrioventricular (AV) block but may be deleterious to left ventricle (LV) systolic function. Previous clinical studies of non-apical pacing have produced conflicting results. The aim of this randomized, prospective, international, multicentre trial was to compare change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between right ventricular apical and high septal (RVHS) pacing over a 2-year study period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 33% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,697,817
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#4,365
of 11,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,367
of 249,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#38
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.