↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for Thinking About Transferring Teaching Innovations into New Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Science Educator, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A Framework for Thinking About Transferring Teaching Innovations into New Settings
Published in
Medical Science Educator, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40670-017-0468-3
Authors

Sarah Gilliland, Tasha R. Wyatt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,480,316
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Medical Science Educator
#601
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,725
of 318,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Science Educator
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.