↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of BRCA Gene Testing on Family Relationships: A Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of BRCA Gene Testing on Family Relationships: A Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10897-009-9232-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather A. Douglas, Rebekah J. Hamilton, Robin E. Grubs

Abstract

Discovery of mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 can have emotional consequences for both the tested individual and his or her relatives. This secondary analysis study investigated how BRCA testing impacts family dynamics and relationships. For the original study, a grounded theory inquiry, participants were recruited from a hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome support website and open-ended interviews were performed asking about individual and family experiences after BRCA testing. All 12 participants whose interviews were included in the secondary analysis had a BRCA mutation. For the secondary analysis, thematic analysis was conducted and revealed three main themes characterizing the effect of BRCA testing on family relationships: 1. That the first in the family to have testing or seek genetic counseling takes on a special family role that can be difficult for them; 2. That discussions in the family often change; and 3. That individuals may feel more or less connected to certain family members. These changes seemed to relate to family cancer history, relationships, coping strategies, communication patterns, and mutation status. Genetic counselors might find it useful to explore these issues in order to prepare clients before BRCA testing and to support them through shifts in family dynamics after disclosure of results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 16%
Social Sciences 23 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,305,567
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#771
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,253
of 114,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.