| Title |
Help-seeking characteristics of Chinese- and English-speaking Australians accessing Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-014-0956-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabella Choi, Gavin Andrews, Louise Sharpe, Caroline Hunt |
| Abstract |
Internet treatments may overcome barriers and improve access to mental health services for people who do not access professional help. It may be particularly beneficial for Chinese Australians, a group that tends to delay and underutilize face-to-face treatments. This study explored the appeal of Internet therapy to Chinese- and English-speaking Australians with depression who accessed Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) programs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,145,757
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,226
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,957
of 240,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.