↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and treatment of iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy and postpartum

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and treatment of iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy and postpartum
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00404-017-4526-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Breymann, C. Honegger, I. Hösli, D. Surbek

Abstract

Iron deficiency occurs frequently in pregnancy and can be diagnosed by serum ferritin-level measurement (threshold value < 30 μg/L). Screening for iron-deficiency anemia is recommended in every pregnant women, and should be done by serum ferritin-level screening in the first trimester and regular hemoglobin checks at least once per trimester. In the case of iron deficiency with or without anaemia in pregnancy, oral iron therapy should be given as first-line treatment. In the case of severe iron-deficiency anemia, intolerance of oral iron, lack of response to oral iron, or in the case of a clinical need for rapid and efficient treatment of anaemia (e.g., advanced pregnancy), intravenous iron therapy should be administered. In the postpartum period, oral iron therapy should be administered for mild iron-deficiency anemia (haemorrhagic anemia), and intravenous iron therapy for moderately severe-to-severe anemia (Hb < 95 g/L). If there is an indication for intravenous iron therapy in pregnancy or postpartum, iron-containing drugs which have been studied in well-controlled clinical trials in pregnancy and postpartum such as ferric carboxymaltose must be preferred for safety reasons. While anaphylactic reactions are extremely are with non-dextrane products, close surveillance during administration is recommended for all intravenous iron products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Student > Master 28 10%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 120 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 129 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,471,797
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#179
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,066
of 323,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.