↓ Skip to main content

Assessments of the global anthropogenic greenhouse and sulfate signal using different types of simplified climate models

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Assessments of the global anthropogenic greenhouse and sulfate signal using different types of simplified climate models
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf00867983
Authors

C. -D. Schönwiese, M. Denhard, J. Grieser, A. Walter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1,474
of 1,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,918
of 29,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.