| Title |
In vivo conditioning of acid–base equilibrium by crystalloid solutions: an experimental study on pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2455-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Langer, E. Carlesso, A. Protti, M. Monti, B. Comini, L. Zani, D. T. Andreis, G. E. Iapichino, D. Dondossola, P. Caironi, S. Gatti, L. Gattinoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 10% |
| Mexico | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 69% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,743,215
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,380
of 5,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,558
of 247,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.