↓ Skip to main content

Implications of differing input data sources and approaches upon forest carbon stock estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Implications of differing input data sources and approaches upon forest carbon stock estimation
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-1022-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Wulder, Joanne C. White, Graham Stinson, Thomas Hilker, Werner A. Kurz, Nicholas C. Coops, Benôit St-Onge, J. A. (Tony) Trofymow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 4%
Colombia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 8 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,324,157
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#235
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,833
of 115,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.