| Title |
Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moritz Mahling, Alexander Münch, Sebastian Schenk, Stephan Volkert, Andreas Rein, Uwe Teichner, Pascal Piontek, Leopold Haffner, Daniel Heine, Andreas Manger, Jörg Reutershan, Peter Rosenberger, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Stephan Zipfel, Nora Celebi |
| Abstract |
Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,811
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,204
of 241,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.