↓ Skip to main content

Screen time and cardiometabolic function in Dutch 5–6 year olds: cross-sectional analysis of the ABCD-study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Screen time and cardiometabolic function in Dutch 5–6 year olds: cross-sectional analysis of the ABCD-study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mai JM Chinapaw, Teatske M Altenburg, Manon van Eijsden, Reinoud JBJ Gemke, Tanja GM Vrijkotte

Abstract

Evidence on the association between different screen behaviours and cardiometabolic biomarkers in children is limited. We examined the independent relationship of TV time and PC time with cardiometabolic biomarkers in Dutch 5-6 year old children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 31%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Sports and Recreations 8 8%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,305,567
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,320
of 14,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,026
of 238,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#229
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.