↓ Skip to main content

Physical Activity Producing Low, but Not Medium or Higher, Vertical Impacts Is Inversely Related to BMI in Older Adults: Findings From a Multicohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical Activity Producing Low, but Not Medium or Higher, Vertical Impacts Is Inversely Related to BMI in Older Adults: Findings From a Multicohort Study
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/gerona/glx176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Elhakeem, Kimberly Hannam, Kevin C Deere, April Hartley, Emma M Clark, Charlotte Moss, Mark H Edwards, Elaine Dennison, Tim Gaysin, Diana Kuh, Andrew Wong, Cyrus Cooper, Rachel Cooper, Jon H Tobias

Abstract

High impact physical activity (PA) is thought to improve skeletal health but its relation to other health outcomes are unclear. We investigated associations between PA impact magnitude and body mass index (BMI) in older adults. Data were from the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA), Hertfordshire Cohort Study and MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Vertical accelerations peaks from seven-day hip-worn accelerometer recordings were used to classify PA as low (0.5<g<1.0g), medium (1<g<1.5g) or higher (≥1.5g) impact. Cohort-specific associations of low, medium and higher impact PA with BMI were examined using linear regressions and estimates combined using random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 1182 participants (mean age=72.7 years, 68% female) were included. Low, medium and higher impact PA were inversely related to BMI in initial models. After adjustment for confounders and other impacts, low, but not medium or higher, impacts were inversely related to BMI (-0.31, P<0.001: overall combined standard deviation change in BMI per doubling in number of low impacts). In adjusted analyses of body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in COSHIBA, low, but not medium or higher, impacts were inversely related to total body fat mass (-0.19, P<0.001) and android:gynoid fat mass ratio (-0.16, P=0.01) whereas high impact PA was weakly and positively associated with lean mass (0.05, P=0.06). Greater exposure to PA producing low magnitude vertical impacts was associated with lower BMI and fat mass at older age. Low impact PA may help reduce obesity risk in older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,144,778
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#1,036
of 3,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,438
of 325,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#23
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.