↓ Skip to main content

Caffeine intake during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 1,771)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Caffeine intake during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10654-014-9944-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren C. Greenwood, Natalie J. Thatcher, Jin Ye, Lucy Garrard, Georgina Keogh, Laura G. King, Janet E. Cade

Abstract

Caffeine is commonly consumed during pregnancy, crosses the placenta, with fetal serum concentrations similar to the mother's, but studies of birth outcome show conflicting findings. We systematically searched Medline and Embase for relevant publications. We conducted meta-analysis of dose-response curves for associations between caffeine intake and spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm delivery, low birth weight and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. Meta-analyses included 60 unique publications from 53 cohort and case-control studies. An increment of 100 g caffeine was associated with a 14 % (95 % CI 10-19 %) increase in risk of spontaneous abortion, 19 % (5-35 %) stillbirth, 2 % (-2 to 6 %) preterm delivery, 7 % (1-12 %) low birth weight, and 10 % (95 % CI 6-14 %) SGA. There was substantial heterogeneity in all models, partly explained by adjustment for smoking and previous obstetric history, but not by prospective assessment of caffeine intake. There was evidence of small-study effects such as publication bias. Greater caffeine intake is associated with an increase in spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, low birth weight, and SGA, but not preterm delivery. There is no identifiable threshold below which the associations are not apparent, but the size of the associations are generally modest within the range of usual intake and are potentially explained by bias in study design or publication. There is therefore insufficient evidence to support further reductions in the maximum recommended intake of caffeine, but maintenance of current recommendations is a wise precaution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 21%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 11 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Psychology 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#155,884
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#35
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,273
of 242,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.