↓ Skip to main content

Non‐invasive urine collection in the female southern hairy‐nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) with the aid of classical conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Zoo Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 1,003)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non‐invasive urine collection in the female southern hairy‐nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) with the aid of classical conditioning
Published in
Zoo Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/zoo.21171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyce M. Swinbourne, Tina Janssen, Clive J. C. Phillips, Stephen D. Johnston

Abstract

We propose that regular urine samples can be used to monitor and characterize the reproductive cycle of the wombat, but this approach has never before been attempted in a marsupial. We conducted a three stage conditioning process for non-invasive urine collection in captive female wombats, which included (1) initial habituation and observation of urination patterns; (2) classical association of a stimulus with urination and (3) urine collection with the classically-conditioned stimulus. Four of the five female wombats selected for this trial were successfully conditioned for urine collection. During stage 2, the animals urinated in response to tactile stimulation 96 times from 208 attempts (46%). In stage 3, urine was successfully collected 399 times from 485 attempts (82%), with the majority of samples being collected in the morning (280/388). Hand-raised females that were previously conditioned for toileting purposes as pouch young responded more rapidly to the stimulus than juvenile females with no prior conditioning. This study is the first description of a successful method of urine collection by classical conditioning in a marsupial. Zoo Biol. XX:XX-XX, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 23%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#962,965
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Zoo Biology
#31
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,772
of 250,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoo Biology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.