You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Dissection of Acute Anterior Uveitis Reveals Similarities and Differences in Associations Observed With Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis & Rheumatology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/art.38873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip C. Robinson, Theodora A. M. Claushuis, Adrian Cortes, Tammy M. Martin, David M. Evans, Paul Leo, Pamela Mukhopadhyay, Linda A. Bradbury, Katie Cremin, Jessica Harris, Walter P. Maksymowych, Robert D. Inman, Proton Rahman, Nigil Haroon, Lianne Gensler, Joseph E. Powell, Irene E. van der Horst‐Bruinsma, Alex W. Hewitt, Jamie E. Craig, Lyndell L. Lim, Denis Wakefield, Peter McCluskey, Valentina Voigt, Peter Fleming, Australio-Anglo-American Spondylitis Consortium Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada, Mariapia Degli‐Esposti, Jennifer J. Pointon, Michael H. Weisman, B. Paul Wordsworth, John D. Reveille, James T. Rosenbaum, Matthew A. Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 4 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
| Iraq | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 26% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,042,669
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#726
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,486
of 365,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#11
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.