You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Epidemiology, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1093/ije/dyx206 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus R Munafò, Kate Tilling, Amy E Taylor, David M Evans, George Davey Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 23 | 24% |
United States | 13 | 13% |
Germany | 5 | 5% |
Australia | 4 | 4% |
Canada | 4 | 4% |
Sweden | 3 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 46% |
Scientists | 39 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 406 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 24% |
Researcher | 83 | 20% |
Student > Master | 39 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
Other | 67 | 17% |
Unknown | 73 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 22% |
Psychology | 37 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
Other | 85 | 21% |
Unknown | 111 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#613,442
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#283
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,745
of 330,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#5
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.