| Title |
Spatial relationships of the bronchial arteries to the left recurrent laryngeal nerve in the sub-aortic arch area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgery Today, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00595-017-1593-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken Hayasaka, Hajime Ishida, Ryosuke Kimura, Tadashi Nishimaki |
| Abstract |
To safely perform lymphadenectomy in the sub-aortic arch area during esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, we investigated the spatial relationships between the bronchial arteries (BAs) and the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN). For this macro-anatomical study, 72 cadavers were used. Of the 195 dissected BAs, 15 (7.7%) arteries ran dorsally across the LRLN. Such a running pattern of the BA was found in 15 (20.8%) of the 72 cadavers. Fourteen (93.3%) of the 15 arteries ran anteriorly along the left side of the esophagus, and 13 (86.7%) passed further to the lateral side of the left main bronchus to reach the ventral surface of the tracheobronchus; we named this running pattern "Type III". Of the 51 arteries with the Type III pattern, 25.5% ran across the dorsal side of the LRLN. Approximately 20% of the cadavers had BAs running dorsally to the LRLN in the sub-aortic arch area. Most of these arteries had the Type III pattern. One-quarter of the BAs with the Type III pattern showed this running pattern. Care must be practiced to safely perform lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with Type III BAs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,572,844
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#559
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,603
of 320,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.