↓ Skip to main content

Tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Stroke, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study
Published in
International Journal of Stroke, September 2017
DOI 10.1177/1747493017733935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce CV Campbell, Peter J Mitchell, Leonid Churilov, Nawaf Yassi, Timothy J Kleinig, Bernard Yan, Richard J Dowling, Steven J Bush, Helen M Dewey, Vincent Thijs, Marion Simpson, Mark Brooks, Hamed Asadi, Teddy Y Wu, Darshan G Shah, Tissa Wijeratne, Timothy Ang, Ferdinand Miteff, Christopher Levi, Martin Krause, Timothy J Harrington, Kenneth C Faulder, Brendan S Steinfort, Peter Bailey, Henry Rice, Laetitia de Villiers, Rebecca Scroop, Wayne Collecutt, Andrew A Wong, Alan Coulthard, PA Barber, Ben McGuinness, Deborah Field, Henry Ma, Winston Chong, Ronil V Chandra, Christopher F Bladin, Helen Brown, Kendal Redmond, David Leggett, Geoffrey Cloud, Anoop Madan, Neil Mahant, Bill O’Brien, John Worthington, Geoffrey Parker, Patricia M. Desmond, Mark W Parsons, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis

Abstract

Background and hypothesis Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase remains standard care prior to thrombectomy for eligible patients within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset. However, alteplase only succeeds in reperfusing large vessel arterial occlusion prior to thrombectomy in a minority of patients. We hypothesized that tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase in achieving reperfusion at initial angiogram, when administered within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset, in patients planned to undergo endovascular therapy. Study design EXTEND-IA TNK is an investigator-initiated, phase II, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint non-inferiority study. Eligibility requires a diagnosis of ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of stroke onset, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale≤3 (no upper age limit), large vessel occlusion (internal carotid, basilar, or middle cerebral artery) on multimodal computed tomography and absence of contraindications to intravenous thrombolysis. Patients are randomized to either IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, max 90 mg) or tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, max 25 mg) prior to thrombectomy. Study outcomes The primary outcome measure is reperfusion on the initial catheter angiogram, assessed as modified treatment in cerebral infarction 2 b/3 or the absence of retrievable thrombus. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale at day 90 and favorable clinical response (reduction in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale by ≥8 points or reaching 0-1) at day 3. Safety outcomes are death and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02388061.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 50 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 34%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 59 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,048,667
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Stroke
#61
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,245
of 326,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Stroke
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.