| Title |
Perceived Discrimination, Patient Trust, and Adherence to Medical Recommendations Among Persons with Sickle Cell Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2986-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlton Haywood, Sophie Lanzkron, Shawn Bediako, John J. Strouse, Jennifer Haythornthwaite, C. Patrick Carroll, Marie Diener-West, Gladys Onojobi, Mary Catherine Beach, for the IMPORT Investigators |
| Abstract |
Adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) report experiencing discriminatory behavior from some healthcare providers. The impact of discrimination on health outcomes in SCD, including adherence to physician recommendations, is not known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#572,949
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#464
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,845
of 242,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#8
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.