| Title |
Adapting systematic conservation planning for climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1442-5 |
| Authors |
April E. Reside, Nathalie Butt, Vanessa M. Adams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 20% |
| Researcher | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 88 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 93 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#536
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,165
of 332,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.