↓ Skip to main content

Dichotomal effect of space flight-associated microgravity on stress-activated protein kinases in innate immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dichotomal effect of space flight-associated microgravity on stress-activated protein kinases in innate immunity
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep05468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Auke P. Verhaar, Elmer Hoekstra, Angela S. W. Tjon, Wesley K. Utomo, J. Jasper Deuring, Elvira R. M. Bakker, Vanesa Muncan, Maikel P. Peppelenbosch

Abstract

Space flight strongly moderates human immunity but is in general well tolerated. Elucidation of the mechanisms by which zero gravity interacts with human immunity may provide clues for developing rational avenues to deal with exaggerated immune responses, e.g. as in autoimmune disease. Using two sounding rockets and one manned Soyuz launch, the influence of space flight on immunological signal transduction provoked by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation was investigated in freshly isolated peripheral blood monocytes and was compared to samples obtained from on-board centrifuge-loaded 1 g controls. The effect of microgravity on immunological signal transduction is highly specific, since LPS dependent Jun-N-terminal kinase activation is impaired in the 0 g condition, while the corresponding LPS dependent activation of p38 MAP kinase remains unaffected. Thus our results identify Jun-N-terminal kinase as a relevant target in immunity for microgravity and support using Jun-N-terminal kinase specific inhibitors for combating autoimmune disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,726,563
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#86,662
of 122,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,296
of 227,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#566
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.